Prof. Thomas S. Kuhn of MIT, Noted Historian of Science, Dead at 73 (2024)

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--Professor Emeritus Thomas S. Kuhn of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the internationally known historian and philosopher who made seminal contributions to understanding how scientific views are supported and discounted over time, died Monday, June 17, at his home in Cambridge. He had been ill for the last two years with cancer of the bronchial tubes and throat. He was 73.

Professor Kuhn, author of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), an enormously influential work on the nature of scientific change, was widely celebrated as the central figure in contemporary thought about how the scientific process evolves.

Earlier this month, for example, Vice President Albert Gore, delivering the June 7 commencement address at MIT, spoke of the relationship "between science and technology on the one hand and humankind and society on the other," and referred to "the great historian of science, Thomas Kuhn."

Mr. Gore said Professor Kuhn "described the way in which our understanding of the world properly evolves when faced with a sudden increase in the amount of information. More precisely, he showed how well-established theories collapse under the weight of new facts and observations which cannot be explained, and then accumulate to the point where the once useful theory is clearly obsolete. As new facts continue to accumulate, a new threshold is reached at which a new pattern is suddenly perceptible and a new theory explaining this pattern emerges. It is an important process, not only at the societal level, but for each of us as individuals as we try to make sense of the growing mountain of information placed at our disposal."

More than one million copies of Professor Kuhn's famous 1962 book have been printed. It exists in more than a dozen languages and continues to be a basic text in the study of the history of science and technology.

From 1982 to 1991, when he became an emeritus professor, Dr. Kuhn held the Laurance S. Rockefeller Professorship in Philosophy. He was the chair's first holder.

Jed Z. Buchwald, the Bern Dibner Professor of the History of Science and director of the Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology, said Professor Kuhn "was the most influential historian and philosopher of science or our time. He instructed and inspired his students and colleagues at Harvard, Berkeley, Princeton and MIT, as well as the tens of thousands of scholars and students in his own and other fields of social science and the humanities who read his works."

Professor Kuhn joined MIT in 1979 from Princeton University where he had been the M. Taylor Pyne Professor of the History of Science and a member of the Institute for Advanced Study. At MIT, his work has centered on cognitive and linguistic processes that bear on the philosophy of science, including the influence of language on the development of science.

Born in Cincinnati in 1922, Professor Kuhn studied physics at Harvard University, where he received the SB (1943), AM (1946) and PhD (1949). His shift from an interest in solid state physics to the history of science, was traceable to a "single 'Eureka!' moment in 1947," according to a 1991 Scientific American article. Professor Kuhn, the article says, "was working toward his doctorate in physics at Harvard University when he was asked to teach some science to undergraduate humanities majors. Searching for a simple case history that could illuminate the roots of Newtonian mechanics, Kuhn opened Aristotle's Physics and was astonished at how 'wrong' it was. How could someone so brilliant on other topics be so misguided in physics? Kuhn was pondering this mystery, staring out of the window of his dormitory room . . .when suddenly Aristotle 'made sense.' Kuhn realized that Aristotle's views of such basic concepts as motion and matter were totally unlike Newton's. Aristotle used the word 'motion,' for example, to refer not just to change in position but to change in general. . . . Understood on its own terms, Aristole's physics 'wasn't just bad Newton,' Kuhn says; it was just different."

Professor Kuhn taught at Harvard and at the University of California, Berkeley, before joining Princeton in 1964. From 1978 to 1979 he was a fellow at the New York Institute for the Humanities.

His honors included the Howard T. Behrman Award for distinguished achievements in the humanities (1977), the History of Science Society's George Sarton Medal (1982) and the Society for Social Studies of Science's John Desmond Bernal Award (1983). He became a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy in 1990 and was given honorary degrees by several universities throughout the world.

He was a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the Philosophy of Science Association (president, 1988-90), and the History of Science Society (president, 1968-70). Professor Kuhn is survived by his wife, Jehane (Barton) Kuhn; two daughters, Sarah Kuhn-La Chance of Framingham, Mass., and Elizabeth Kuhn of Los Angles, and a son, Nathaniel Kuhn of Arlington, Mass.

The service is private. A memorial service will be held at MIT in the fall.

Contributions in his memory may be made to Hospice of Cambridge, 186 Alewife Brook Parkway, Cambridge, Mass. 02138

Prof. Thomas S. Kuhn of MIT, Noted Historian of Science, Dead at 73 (2024)

FAQs

What does Thomas Kuhn say about science? ›

Kuhn made several claims concerning the progress of scientific knowledge: that scientific fields undergo periodic "paradigm shifts" rather than solely progressing in a linear and continuous way, and that these paradigm shifts open up new approaches to understanding what scientists would never have considered valid ...

What was Thomas Kuhn's conclusion? ›

Summary. Thomas Kuhn argued that science does not evolve gradually toward truth. Science has a paradigm that remains constant before going through a paradigm shift when current theories can't explain some phenomenon, and someone proposes a new theory.

What is Thomas Kuhn best known for? ›

Kuhn (born July 18, 1922, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.—died June 17, 1996, Cambridge, Massachusetts) was an American historian of science noted for The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), one of the most influential works of history and philosophy written in the 20th century.

What does Kuhn mean by puzzle solving? ›

Regarding science as puzzle-solving, Kuhn explained normal science as slowly accumulating detail in accord with established broad theory, without questioning or challenging the underlying assumptions of that theory.

What is the main argument of Kuhn? ›

Kuhn argued for an episodic model in which periods of conceptual continuity where there is cumulative progress, which Kuhn referred to as periods of "normal science", were interrupted by periods of revolutionary science. The discovery of "anomalies" during revolutions in science leads to new paradigms.

What does Kuhn say about truth? ›

In his work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn argues that science does not progress towards truth; rather, science operates under 'paradigms' in the sense that an accepted scientific viewpoint is a body of intertwined theoretical and methodological beliefs that delineate the relevant questions and ...

Why was Kuhn controversial? ›

This is because Kuhn created useful models and terminology to better understand history as thought in a time where relativism and revisionism was becoming of increasing value in academic circles. The conflict was about the future of science and what standards scientists should be held to when they conduct research.

What is the overview of Kuhn's philosophy of science? ›

Thomas Kuhn's philosophy of science is premised on the notion that there are two types of science: normal science and revolutionary science. Normal science is our conventional view of science as cumulative: new ideas are piled on top of old ones to increase the overall knowledge that we have.

What is the historical perspective of science by Thomas Kuhn? ›

During normal science, scientists work within a paradigm to solve puzzles, but over time anomalies can lead to a paradigm shift opening up a new approach. Kuhn emphasized that science is shaped by subjective perspectives and there can be competing views until a new paradigm is widely accepted.

What are the objections to Thomas Kuhn? ›

These limitations include: a failure to account for historical scientific advancements that occur outside of their supposed “paradigm”; a failure to explain additional factors that affect scientific progression, such as irrational oppression of science by non-scientific powers; and an inability to be applied ...

What are the theoretical virtues of Kuhn? ›

Kuhn listed five such permanent values (theoretical virtues) operative in theory choice: accuracy, consistency, scope (unification), simplicity, and fruitfulness (p. 332).

What is the importance of Kuhn's model? ›

On Kuhn's account, the growth of scientific knowledge follows a pattern; periods of normal science, characterized by widespread consensus, are interrupted by paradigm changes, where the prevailing consensus breaks down, and a new consensus emerges around a new, fundamentally different, paradigm or theory.

What are the five values of Kuhn? ›

Chicago: CUP, 1977d/1977.), where he examines the nature and role of values in a more detailed way. In this paper, Kuhn suggests five basic criteria that define a good theory: accuracy, consistency, scope, simplicity, and fruitfulness (1977d. In The Essential Tension.

What is the response to crisis by Thomas Kuhn? ›

VIII - The Response to Crisis. The awareness and acknowledgement that a crisis exists loosens theoretical stereotypes and provides the incremental data necessary for a fundamental paradigm shift. Normal science does and must continually strive to bring theory and fact into closer agreement.

What does Kuhn say sociology? ›

As such, Kuhn argues that sociology is not a mature, mainstream science, because it hasn't found a unifying paradigm. Sociologists do not share a set of assumptions about the world or about how to do research.

What did Kuhn argue that science is conducted within frameworks called? ›

Kuhn contrasts paradigm shifts, which characterize a Scientific Revolution, to the activity of normal science, which he describes as scientific work done within a prevailing framework or paradigm.

What does Kuhn claim about the developmental process of science? ›

According to Kuhn the development of a science is not uniform but has alternating 'normal' and 'revolutionary' (or 'extraordinary') phases.

What for Kuhn is the difference between normal and revolutionary science? ›

Kuhn states that during a period of 'normal science,' scientists were guided by a preexisting paradigm, a widely accepted view. When scientists observe something that does not fit the paradigm, this area of science enters a time of 'revolutionary science' in which a possible new paradigm is created.

What are the five characteristics of a good scientific theory that Kuhn mentions? ›

In The Essential Tension. Chicago: CUP, 1977d/1977.), where he examines the nature and role of values in a more detailed way. In this paper, Kuhn suggests five basic criteria that define a good theory: accuracy, consistency, scope, simplicity, and fruitfulness (1977d. In The Essential Tension.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Last Updated:

Views: 5838

Rating: 5 / 5 (50 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dr. Pierre Goyette

Birthday: 1998-01-29

Address: Apt. 611 3357 Yong Plain, West Audra, IL 70053

Phone: +5819954278378

Job: Construction Director

Hobby: Embroidery, Creative writing, Shopping, Driving, Stand-up comedy, Coffee roasting, Scrapbooking

Introduction: My name is Dr. Pierre Goyette, I am a enchanting, powerful, jolly, rich, graceful, colorful, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.