California high-speed rail project is late, over budget. But there's no $11B bridge | Fact check (2024)

The claim: New high-speed rail bridge cost $11 billion

A May 5 Facebook post (direct link, archive link) shows a picture of a viaduct over the Fresno River.

“This stretch of bridge right here in California was just completed and cost get this 11 billion dollars!” the post reads. “Also took just 9 years. Will be used for high-speed rail.”

The post was shared more than 2,000 times in nine days.

More from the Fact-Check Team: How we pick and research claims | Email newsletter | Facebook page

Our rating: False

The California High-Speed Rail Authority said it can't provide a specific cost for the bridge in the picture, but it's not in the billions. The agency says it has paid out $2 billion on a contract for a 32-mile stretch of projects that included this viaduct and more than a dozen other projects.

Claim overstates delays, cost overruns

California’s effort to build an electric high-speed rail line – cruising north of 200 miles per hour in some stretches – is well off original estimates of completion time, scale and cost.

The system was planned to cover 500 miles from San Francisco to Los Angeles for $33 billion and be operational by 2020. But the full buildout is now projected to cost as much as $128 billion, according to the authority. It is prioritizing getting an initial 171-mile stretch in central California operational in the early 2030s. And the project is significantly underfunded.

Yet those cost overruns and delays are far less than what is claimed in the post. It is impossible for the Fresno River Viaduct, the 1,600-foot-long structure pictured in the post, to cost $11 billion, based on publicly available information.

Augie Blancas, a spokesperson for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, said the body cannot break out a cost for the viaduct alone because it is part of what the authority called the first “significant” construction contract awarded for the 32-mile central California segment, and that entire package of projects has not been completed yet. However, he noted the authority has approved about $2 billion worth of invoices for that package.

That matches up with the amount the package's design-build contractor lists on its website for the same package, which it says includes "12 roadway/railroad grade separations,two mainline viaducts,one tunnel, realignments of existing railroad tracks, utility relocations, roadway relocations,two trench sections and a major river crossing over the San Joaquin River."

Since the whole package has cost $2 billion to date, it is impossible for the viaduct alone to have cost $11 billion, Blancas noted.

The $11 billion figure may have come from a projection on the rail authority's website, where the body said it expected spending on the entire system statewide between July 2006 through June 2023 to total $11.2 billion. Blancas pointed to a more recent report that showed the authority had spent $12.4 billion as of the end of February 2024. The Fresno River Viaduct is among 45 structures the authority says it has completed around the state, with another 33 underway.

Fact check: Viral post critical of electric cars mistakes copper mine for lithium mine

The post also gives a significantly inaccurate timeline for the span’s construction.

The viaduct was built between 2015 and 2018, according to the rail authority’s website. The start of construction was reported on in 2015 by KFSN-TV. It is possible the claim stems from the authority sharing a photo of the viaduct recently on social media.

Dogecoin creator Billy Markus was among those lampooning the rail authority celebrating the project, and his wording in a May 3 post matches the false claim in the Facebook post two days later.

"This is the most remarkable human achievement ever, 1600 feet of high speed rail after 9 years and 11 billion dollars," he wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. "It takes about 5 minutes to walk 1600 feet so a high speed rail for that is a really big deal."

USA TODAY reached out to the social media user who shared the claim for comment.

Lead Stories also debunked the claim.

Our fact-check sources:

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or e-newspaper here.

USA TODAY is a verified signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network, which requires a demonstrated commitment to nonpartisanship, fairness and transparency. Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Meta.

California high-speed rail project is late, over budget. But there's no $11B bridge | Fact check (2024)

FAQs

How much of the California high-speed rail is complete? ›

California High-Speed Rail
Technical
System length171 mi (275 km) IOS only 494 mi (795 km) full Phase 1 776 mi (1,249 km) completed system
No. of tracks2 (plus 2 tracks in stations)
Track gauge4 ft 81⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
16 more rows

What happened to the California high-speed rail? ›

422 miles of the high-speed rail project's 500-mile Phase 1 alignment from San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim has received environmental clearance, with 119 miles in active construction. The Authority is committed to clearing the entire 500 miles of the system from San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim.

What company is building the high-speed rail in California? ›

The contractor is California Rail Builders, a joint venture of Ferrovial-Agroman West, LLC and Griffith Company.

How much does high-speed rail cost compared to the freeway? ›

High-speed rail is the best value investment, with a cost range of $89 billion to $128 billion compared to the cost range of $179 billion to $253 billion that would be necessary to construct the equivalent highway and air passenger capacity.

How long will the bullet train take from Los Angeles to San Francisco? ›

The system will run from San Francisco to the Los Angeles basin in under three hours at speeds capable of over 200 miles per hour. The system will eventually extend to Sacramento and San Diego, totaling 800 miles with up to 24 stations.

How long would a bullet train take from New York to California? ›

It's 3000 miles from NYC to LA. Assume an average speed of 150 mph, that's 20 hours of motion. Add in stops or change of trains, that's probably 30 hours total.

Who pays for California High-Speed Rail? ›

Our funding sources include Cap-and-Trade funding, Proposition 1A, as well as federal grants.

Why is the California bullet train taking so long? ›

In 2008, California voted yes to build the nation's first high-speed railway. The plan is to build an electric train that will connect Los Angeles and San Francisco in two hours and forty minutes. But 15 years later, there is not a single mile of track laid, and there isn't enough money to finish the project.

Will the US ever get high-speed rail? ›

The California High-Speed Rail Project plans to operate a 320kph bullet train line that connects San Francisco to the Los Angeles Basin in less than three hours. As part of the state's economic regeneration plans, it is undertaking an ambitious infrastructure project that will be the US's first high-speed rail system.

Will California high-speed rail be electric? ›

"It'll be 100% electrified. It will use renewable power. It will literally be, not an embellishment, the greenest train in the world." Given that no major high-speed railway is fully powered by renewables currently, that may be true if the $12 billion Brightline West project opens on schedule by 2028.

How much will a bullet train ticket cost? ›

Estimating fares for a 2028 train.

According to a study by the Los Angeles Times, the most current projected fare for the train, $86 a ride, would still be one of the most inexpensive high-speed rail trips on a per-mile basis.

What is the source of power for the California high-speed rail? ›

High-speed rail in California will be fully solar powered. The high-speed system will deliver a new utility-scale system on land it already owns that includes: Approximately 540 acres of solar panels. Generating about 35 megawatts of electricity for traction power.

Why high-speed rail is too expensive? ›

Inflation and higher construction costs have contributed to the high price tag. The project has spent $9.8 billion so far, according to Brian Kelly, CEO of the California High-Speed Rail Authority. “We knew we've had a funding gap ever since the project started,” Kelly said.

Would high-speed rail be cheaper than flying? ›

Sure, you could fly, but once you factor in traveling to the airport, going through security, and sitting on a taxiway, the high-speed train is still faster. It would also be cheaper. A lot cheaper. That high-speed train ticket would cost about $75, compared to more than $200 to fly or drive.

Is there money for high-speed rail in the infrastructure bill? ›

The $3.1 billion for California High-Speed Rail Authority is the single largest grant for the program and comes from President Biden's historic Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

How many stops does the California High-Speed Rail have? ›

The high-speed rail system will consist of up to 24 stations when completed, connecting the major population centers in the North and South through California's Central Valley.

How long is Phase 1 of the California High-Speed Rail? ›

Phase I, about 520 miles (840 km) long using high-speed rail through the Central Valley, will connect San Francisco to Los Angeles.

Will California High-Speed Rail be electric? ›

"It'll be 100% electrified. It will use renewable power. It will literally be, not an embellishment, the greenest train in the world." Given that no major high-speed railway is fully powered by renewables currently, that may be true if the $12 billion Brightline West project opens on schedule by 2028.

What is the source of power for the California High-Speed Rail? ›

High-speed rail in California will be fully solar powered. The high-speed system will deliver a new utility-scale system on land it already owns that includes: Approximately 540 acres of solar panels. Generating about 35 megawatts of electricity for traction power.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Last Updated:

Views: 6371

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Birthday: 1999-05-27

Address: Apt. 171 8116 Bailey Via, Roberthaven, GA 58289

Phone: +2585395768220

Job: Lead Liaison

Hobby: Lockpicking, LARPing, Lego building, Lapidary, Macrame, Book restoration, Bodybuilding

Introduction: My name is Sen. Ignacio Ratke, I am a adventurous, zealous, outstanding, agreeable, precious, excited, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.